Will Joe Workman’s SEO Helper stack work in Source?
Thanks
Barry
Will Joe Workman’s SEO Helper stack work in Source?
Thanks
Barry
Most probably yes.
just checked and they work fine together.
Hejsan I am using Source and the SEOHelper stacks works just fine :-)
Kind Regards
Thanks everyone
Kent as someone using SEO Helper in Source I wondered if you could help me out with some questions.
I’m using SEO Helper 2 for the first time and I am not sure what goes into the following SEO Basic fields:
Title: (should this be the page name that is in the browser title?)
Image URL: (what should the image be? Could I use a jpg of the site logo?)
Description: (should this be the same as used in RW’s old page meta tags?)
Sorry if these are dumb questions
Also I notice that SEO Helper has nowhere to put keywords, are they no longer necessary?
Thanks,
Richard
Hej
Yes off course.
Keywords should be contained in the texts of your website. Also try to use keywords for pictures, page titles etc. Picture descriptions etc. It is good to give the pictures a description if the stack you are using allow that.
It is also good to name the various folder for your various pages with a keyword that is contained in those pages. Like the contact page should be named contact.html or .php in a folder called contact and so on.
Kind Regards
Kent
Thanks Kent that is really helpful, much appreciated. Regarding keywords would you recommend removing them completely from RW’s meta tags (which is how they were on the old site).
Thanks again,
Richard
You are most welcome :-) No there is no need to remove them
Google no longer looks at the keywords
tag. It hasn’t for years. While you don’t have to remove it, you’re technically loading less in the paste if you do. To be clear, performance impact is 0.00. More importantly, and this is just me, when I inspect a site and see Keywords meta, I form an opinion that the designer lacked knowledge about what they were doing.
Thanks Bret for that information.